"I do not love you, you sick psycho, I hate you! You are terrorizing me and I wish nothing more than for you to not exist on this earth because you do nobody any good and the world would be better off without you!"
                                                                                                                                                                                L.O. 
(The terrified 'Victim)

Weaponized Narrative

There is no narcissistic relationship without the weaponization of narrative. In the hands of someone like L.O., narrative is not merely a way to express feeling, it becomes a strategic apparatus: a self-preserving system of carefully managed lies, omissions, role reversals, and emotional blackmail. The goal is always control. And when that control is threatened, she pivots instantly into the victim, no matter how aggressive, hostile, or manipulative she has just been. This tactic wasn't occasional. It was the centerpiece of her psychological warfare.

 

The Setup: Emotional Inversion

In many ways, the moment I began asserting boundaries, questioning contradictions, asking for accountability, or even merely observing her behavior, she would launch into rage, followed almost immediately by declarations of victimhood. Her favorite line, repeated like a mantra, was: "You're destroying my life." She said this while threatening to destroy mine. She said this after days of silence, after calling me names, after orchestrating humiliations and betrayals. The inversion was stunning, and I now realize, entirely calculated.

One of the earliest and clearest examples came in a sequence of emotionally charged emails from August 13–16, 2024. In these, she accused me of “cold-hearted terror,” of trying to sabotage a nonexistent medical condition, of threatening her breathing and her life. She claimed to have a disability, one she never documented, while using that claim to accuse me of cruelty and blackmail. She issued multiple explicit threats: that she would “destroy my career,” “go public,” “release my photos,” “release my videos,” and even encouraged strangers to “stand outside my door.” All while insisting that I was the one threatening her.

L.O: “I have your address. I have your passport. If you dare to write any surgeon or do any other shit with the recordings... you will pay for it.”
, August 15, 2024

That same day, she followed with this:

“You don’t delete the recordings? Then I don’t delete the dick pics... You wanna go to war? You can have it.”

And yet, within minutes of those threats, she would pivot, playing the victim, accusing me of harassment, and positioning herself as someone “terrified” and “under attack.” This was her system: provoke, attack, escalate, then when confronted, cry victim.

 

Narcissistic Rage

One evening, during one of our regular Discord movie nights, something we did four or five times a week, I noticed something while watching her on camera. She was blinking rapidly. It was noticeable and odd, and I commented gently: "You blink really fast. Did you know that?" That was it. No insult, no judgment. Just an observation.

She flew into a rage. Shut down the chat. Blocked me for the night. The next day, I reached out to find out what had happened. Her reply?

"What you said to me, you just don't do that. You don’t comment on someone’s face... You don’t have the right to talk to people like that. That is not my problem but yours."

She went on to say she no longer wanted contact and that I insulted her "every other day."

The sheer disproportionality of her reaction baffled me at the time. But now I understand. It wasn't about blinking. It was about control of the narrative. Any observation that made her feel “seen”, any moment where she might not be in full control of her image — triggered an existential threat. My comment punctured the illusion she so carefully curated. And her response wasn’t emotional; it was tactical. She wasn’t hurt. She was enraged that I noticed something she couldn’t spin.

The Pattern of Reversal

This is the pattern I now see clearly in hindsight:

  1. She attacks first, emotionally, verbally, or through stonewalling.

  2. I respond, sometimes defensively, sometimes angrily.

  3. She reframes my response as the origin of the conflict.

  4. She declares victimhood while escalating or issuing new threats.

In her world, there was no such thing as mutual conflict. There was her pain, always justified, always paramount, and my actions, always framed as unjustified, threatening, and abusive. She constantly reframed reality so that I was the cause of everything: her distress, her lost job, her need to go no-contact, even her imagined medical condition.

“I will not be sitting here losing doctors appointment because of you... I will not let you get away with it just because you live in South Africa.”

Again, the threats were real, repeated, and explicit. And yet she would write a single line afterwards like, "Please stop terrorizing me like this," and use it to frame the whole exchange as my fault.

 

Manufacturing the Villain

In the end, what she wanted wasn’t justice. It wasn’t healing. It was a villain. She needed someone to point to as the reason for her pain, her failures, and her unraveling mask. She needed a scapegoat, and when I stopped playing the part of the submissive, forgiving, guilt-ridden partner, she turned me into that scapegoat.

The irony is that I was never trying to destroy her life. I loved her once. I didn’t want revenge. I wanted understanding. I wanted truth. And that made me dangerous, not because I had power, but because I had clarity. Because I saw through her performance she needed to destroy me. 

And so she rewrote the script, turned me into the monster, and cast herself as the trembling, terrorized victim.

 

Closing Reflection

This page is not here to disprove her lies point by point, she’s told too many for that to be useful. It’s here to show the pattern. The psychology. The tactic. And to remind anyone reading: when someone always plays the victim, even while threatening you, humiliating you, or violating your boundaries, they are not a victim. They are an actor. And sometimes, a very dangerous one. As a final thought I want to remind you that we have never met in real life, she did all this to me through an entirely online relationship. She has destroyed  my career, reputation, ability to make an income, my prospects in the field of AI, had my equipment confiscated, hacked my accounts and attempted to steal my money, almost ended my marriage, psychologically and emotionally abused me for a year all while she has suffered no ill effects at all, despite her cries of being"terrorized". 

 

“The Narcissist’s Mirror”

Nine frames. Eight performances, One truth. She doesn’t change, because she can’t. There's the Mask, smile fixed, posture rehearsed, the warmth almost real. The other person is just temporary, a bit player. She's the star. A star that never changes her costume. She’s not posing. She’s posturing.

 

And then, in the middle, just for a moment, the mask slips.

The illusion vanishes and you catch a glimpse of the empty void inside. But there is something hiding. Something sneering and grimacing. Something ugly and disgusting. And then it's gone. The mask is back. The others are props, reflections of her desired self-image. The real woman is the predator posing as  vulnerable. What you saw was the real 'her'. That’s her when she forgets to act.

 

And in the middle, the face she never meant for you to see.  Now you know. You were never looking at a real person.

You were looking at the frames she wanted you to stand in.

You were always just a prop for her performance.

Read More

Below: One of her many "Friends " that come from out of town and stay over for the night, always single females. The reason is obvious.

Threats #4

Subject: “Fake Screenshots, 1000 Insults, and Legal Consequences”
Date: 30 April 2024
Format: Email from L.O. to Klaus
Status: Sent during a period of escalating accusations following a failed attempt at reconciliation
Context: This message follows Klaus’s attempts to document abusive patterns using screenshots. L.O., aware of the gathering of evidence, lashes out in an extended tirade, disputing the authenticity of the material, reframing the victim–offender roles, and escalating to threats of legal, reputational, and professional destruction.


Email Excerpt (L.O.):

“I have made a screen recording of all your messages of 'eddington' and I consider sending it to the PIKA Team.
They will see how you constantly threaten me and try to damage my reputation online.
Also, you faked some of these screenshots and inserted some passages where I am 100% sure that I did not say these things.

Just to the rest:
– I made my Facebook private because you threatened to write all my friends
– Everything you accuse me of is what you did to me
– You did not teach me PIKA or After Effects
– I have over 1000 insults and threats from you; your 5 screenshots are fake
– You are still writing my boss and damaging my reputation
– Even if screenshots were real, it was a relationship and private

Yes I wrote you emails last night but they weren’t toxic—they were grief and peace

Once and for all, I dumped you because you are highly toxic with a personality disorder
Look at all the damage you did to me and Zelda

It just makes no sense to write you any email.

I will forward your insults to the police. You know I can sue you for that, right?”


Behavioral Analysis

Tone and Framing:
This email is aggressive and defensive from the outset. The tone is that of a prosecutor preparing a case, issuing claims as facts, and preemptively invalidating any evidence Klaus may present. It begins with threats of exposure and legal action, then attempts to reframe prior written messages as peaceful gestures. The conclusion is a classic contradiction: claiming that communication is pointless while issuing one final barrage.

Projection and Accusation:
This is textbook projection. Every behavior L.O. is accused of—emotional manipulation, false accusations, professional sabotage—is mirrored back onto Klaus without evidence. She denies key shared experiences (like learning PIKA or After Effects) to minimize his role and inflate her own. She asserts that Klaus is the one with a “personality disorder” and accuses him of precisely what he has documented her doing. This allows her to maintain the victim role while invalidating his narrative.


Key Threat Vectors:

  1. Threat of Reporting to Authorities:

    • “I will forward your insults to the police… I can sue you.”
      A clear escalation toward legal intimidation, framed as justified but delivered with vindictive energy.

  2. Reputational Destruction:

    • “You are still writing my boss… You will get consequences… The mods are aware.”
      This includes both real-world employment threats and digital ostracism—attempting to isolate Klaus from his professional and creative communities.

  3. Discrediting of Evidence:

    • “You faked some of these screenshots.”
      A preemptive strike meant to neutralize evidence by declaring it forged, without offering proof. A common tactic when facing exposure.

  4. Dismissal and Gaslighting of Prior Abuse:

    • “Even if they WERE real, this is private… does NOT give you any right…”
      This reframes abusive content as consensual and private, thereby stripping Klaus of any right to seek protection or truth.


Plain Language Interpretation for General Readers:

L.O. is saying:

  • If you keep trying to prove what I did, I will report you to your boss and the police.

  • Any proof you have is fake, or it was private, so you have no right to use it.

  • Everything you say I did, you actually did to me.

  • I was the victim all along, and you are mentally ill.

  • If you continue talking or defending yourself, I’ll destroy your reputation and take legal action.

This message is not a defense—it’s a multipronged attack dressed as a rebuttal. It uses shame, fear, and professional threat to silence opposition.


Pattern Summary:

  • Narrative Control: Attempts to rewrite history by denying facts, experiences, and contributions.

  • Legal and Reputational Threats: Employs scare tactics to intimidate Klaus into silence.

  • Emotional Reversal: Reframes L.O.’s messages as “grief” and Klaus’s as “insults.”

  • Projection and Gaslighting: Declares Klaus the abuser using the language of mental health and victimhood.

  • Preemptive Discrediting: Labels his screenshots as fake to inoculate herself from accountability.

Threats #5

Subject:
A final “goodbye” cloaked in legal intimidation and reputational threats.

Date:
27th September 2024

Format:
Email

Status:
Confirmed. Included in email archive and backed by evidence of simultaneous communication with Dom during her stay in Rastatt. Sent roughly two months before coordinated cyberattacks began.

Context:
At the time of this email, L.O. was living in Rastatt, confirmed via hotel records and communications with her family. Dom was seen in a photo with her around mid-September, and other evidence (Telegram profile updates, script drafts, and a resurfacing embrace photo) confirms their renewed contact, proving L.O. had lied when stating she was not seeing anyone else. 

This message was sent under the pretense of “final closure,” but it marks a turning point, a calculated attempt to:

  • Establish a false narrative of victimhood

  • Frame Klaus as a dangerous stalker

  • Warn him into silence

  • Preemptively justify any future retaliation or legal action

This email appears to have been composed in tandem with planning for the November hacks, likely to establish a written record for later use as "evidence" or intimidation.

Email Excerpt:

“Your behavior has escalated to a level that is not only toxic but also criminal... any continuation will result in consequences for you and your family.”

“You are now under investigation by Interpol. Your previous convictions are being reviewed.”

“My parents' employers are prepared to take legal action against you if you continue to write emails to them.”

“You made my life a living hell… I submitted an entire CD containing your emails, screenshots, fake videos…”

“You terrorized me for months... Now let it go — in your own interest and that of your family.”

“Once and for all: I did not use you. I’m sorry you felt that way. I didn’t cheat on you, I left you.” (Again proven to be a lie)


Behavioral Analysis

Tone and Framing:

  • Official: The email is structured like a legal cease-and-desist letter rather than a personal goodbye.

  • Self-righteous: Poses as morally superior, expressing no remorse but plenty of condescension.

  • Grave and absolute: Uses phrases like “final communication,” “any continuation will result in consequences,” and “in your own interest and that of your family” to signal threat while preserving plausible deniability.

  • Pathos-driven logic: Describes her emotional suffering in elaborate detail while criminalizing Klaus’s pain or responses as signs of mental illness. 

Projection and Accusation:

  • Accuses Klaus of:

    • Stalking, threats, emotional terrorism

    • Public defamation and platform abuse

    • Fabricating videos

    • Using her voice through AI for harm

  • Projects her own future actions (i.e., public exposure, hacking, manipulation of employers) as things Klaus is either already doing or threatening to do — a classic tactic used to justify retaliation.

Key Threat Vectors:

  1. Legal Threats:

    • Claims of Interpol investigation, reviewed convictions, and legal representation.

    • Involvement of “her parents’ employers” as a corporate legal threat.

    • Alleged CD of ‘evidence’ submitted to police.

  2. Reputational Threats:

    • Threat to forward Klaus’s emails and videos to his wife.

    • Threats of YouTube takedowns and professional blacklisting in AI circles.

    • Claims that multiple companies are monitoring him and ready to act.

  3. Emotional Coercion:

    • Uses pathos and emotional guilt to soften the reader before inserting threats.

    • Poses as the hurt party while painting any counter-narrative as mentally ill or delusional.

  4. Narrative Dominance:

    • This email is not meant to close contact, it is meant to control the story, preempt scrutiny, and silence dissent.


Plain Language Interpretation for General Readers:

This email was written after L.O. had already reconnected with her ex-partner Dom and before she initiated cyberattacks against Klaus. It pretends to be a farewell message, but it's actually a calculated list of threats: legal, personal, and reputational.

She warns Klaus to stay silent or risk losing his career, being arrested by Interpol, and having his family punished, none of which is realistic, but all of which are meant to scare him into submission. She uses psychological abuse tactics, flipping the narrative so that she appears as the victim, even though she had already begun coordinating attacks. It is theatre as she has alreay set in motion plans to destroy my livelihood and my reputation as well as have me arrested. 

This is not a goodbye letter. It is a loaded gun wrapped in a velvet glove.


Pattern Summary:

This entry aligns with the core profile of L.O.'s tactics:

  • Preemptive Justification: Sent just before the November hacks, laying the groundwork for her “victim” story.

  • Reversal of Blame: Paints Klaus as unstable and criminal while ignoring her own manipulations, false accusations, and coordinated sabotage.

  • Escalating Threats: Introduces Interpol, employers, YouTube takedowns, and potential lawsuits all in one letter.

  • Scripted Detachment: Her “I did not use you” speech mimics earlier discard phases — emotionally distant yet surgically worded.

  • Victim-as-Predator: The most dangerous variant — one who pretends to be hunted while quietly sharpening the knife.

Threats #6

Subject:
The sacred bond inverted, a love letter weaponized into a final declaration of war.

Date:
25th November 2024

Format:
Email

Status:
Confirmed. Sent during the peak of the hacking campaign. This email arrives three weeks before L.O. files criminal charges, amid simultaneous takeovers of Klaus’s online accounts, impersonation profiles, and attempts to discredit him publicly.

Context:
This message is perhaps the most revealing of all. Unlike earlier emails that feigned closure or moral superiority, this one is emotionally saturated and vengeful. It directly references Klaus’s past affection and uses it as a rhetorical weapon. Sent while she was likely coordinating with Dom in real-time, this email serves multiple functions:

  • It reframes Klaus as a monstrous predator

  • It frames herself as a tragic heroine

  • It escalates the threats to existential proportions

  • It signals — with chilling clarity — that the “charges” she will soon file are already a foregone conclusion

She claims to have written a book. She invokes both the German and South African police. She accuses him of crimes with a certainty and dramatic flair that mirrors confession-by-projection.

This is the final curtain of her constructed narrative — part legal threat, part psychological attack, part personal vendetta — all under the mask of violated trust.

Email Excerpt (Select Highlights):

“And I know that I need you to make my life worth living... I’ll do whatever it takes to be with you for any time I can.”
These words you once wrote to me. Since then, every single one of your words has turned out to be a lie.

“You tried to make me lose two jobs. You threatened and terrorized my family and friends. You forged my files... causing massive public defamation.”

“You didn’t stop at me; you dragged my entire environment into your terror, which has escalated to death threats.”

“I have proof of every single one of your crimes. Since February, I have been in constant contact with the German police.”

“You will pay for what you have done to me in various ways. But the harshest punishment will ultimately be your own rudiment of a heart.”

Behavioral Analysis

Tone and Framing:

  • Apocalyptic and Biblical: L.O. opens with what could pass for wedding vows — only to shatter them like broken glass at a funeral. The contrast is deliberately jarring.

  • Triumphal and Vengeful: Unlike earlier messages that feigned reason, this email relishes the threat. She declares that Klaus’s punishment is assured. Her tone is theatrical, self-eulogizing.

  • Reverent yet Condemning: She mourns the “loss” of trust and then uses it to justify extreme retaliation. This is a betrayal monologue, stylized to sound like a Shakespearean death sentence.

  • Narrative finality: She declares, “I’ve written a book.” This implies that she is not just threatening legal action — she is immortalizing her version of the story. For a narcissist, that’s more sacred than any court.

Projection and Accusation:

  • Reverses her own behavior onto Klaus:

    • Digital terror, when she was the one conducting the hacks

    • Defamation, when she was the one impersonating him

    • File forging, when she tampered with Discord and voice recordings

    • Gaslighting, when that was her primary method of psychological control

  • By claiming she was deceived by his lovebombing, she reverses the entire emotional arc and claims the role of the abused — a key step in her campaign to weaponize the narrative.

Key Threat Vectors:

  1. Institutional Escalation:

    • Explicit threats of involvement from German and South African authorities

    • Prepares the groundwork for criminal charges later filed in December

  2. Public and Literary Threats:

    • She states she is writing a book — indicating her plan to publicly immortalize a defamatory account

    • This is both reputational sabotage and psychological torment

  3. Emotional Inversion:

    • Opens with Klaus’s loving words, then labels them all lies

    • Uses this to justify escalating retaliation, including hacking and impersonation

  4. Totalizing Language of Condemnation:

    • “Every word was a lie”

    • “You have engaged in every form of digital destruction”

    • “You terrorized my family and friends”

    • These sweeping statements are not only untrue but signal a narrative of finality and irrevocability

Plain Language Interpretation for General Readers:

This is the climax of a long manipulation campaign. L.O. uses Klaus’s own loving words to mock him. She accuses him of crimes that — based on the evidence — she and Dom were committing against him at the time. She presents herself as a tragic victim of love turned to terror and claims to have been in contact with police since February, long before any formal accusations were made.

She says she’s written a book. She invokes two countries' police forces. She declares that Klaus will “pay,” and that his family might suffer too. There is no goodbye here. This is a personal execution letter — her final act of control before she files charges.

Pattern Summary:

  • Weaponized Vulnerability: Klaus’s words of affection are used as an emotional boomerang — turned into evidence of betrayal.

  • Predetermined Legal Setup: The reference to police contact since February and the “proof of every crime” match the typical smear campaign trajectory.

  • Narrative Hijack: She claims she’s written a book — meaning her version is not only set in stone, it’s set in ink.

  • Final Dehumanization: The phrase “rudiment of a heart” signals the total moral and emotional annihilation of the target. To her, Klaus is no longer a person. He’s a relic. An empty shell to be punished and discarded.

  • Timing Coordination: This email, in both tone and content, coincides with the most aggressive phase of account hacking and data deletion. It is not a coincidence. It is a narrative shield timed to the execution of the cyberattack.