A swarm of Grabler's

 

22nd July 2025

Something new has come up. I have been on Facebook for more than 10 years and often look for others with my surname as I search for relatives I might have. With less than 1000 Grabler's worldwide it was always difficult to find more than a few.  Now with L.O. actively attacking me on a regular basis I have instituted rigorous monitoring of all social media platforms.

I've discovered two fake profiles on Facebook, one called 'Lea Grabler' and a clone of my own account Klaus Grabler. Just a few days ago I discovered another one -  Jan Grabler. Today, after suddenly receiving more than 20 spam phone calls, I found 150+ new fake accounts with the surname 'Grabler' on Facebook. No profile images, no photos, no posts. Most have no friends or any details or information. This is no coincidence. A well known and fingerprinted device (MacBook Air - Catalina OS) operating from Germany accessed the recently updated Vogelsang page directly 3 times today. Obviously L.O. is extremely worried about what I know, and trying to prevent me from exposing it, the network, and her. So far I have discovered the following profiles that are all fake:

Marius Grabler, Sabine Grabler, Christian Grabler, Sophia Grabler, Hans Martin Grabler, Belane Grabler, Katharina Grabler, Lisa Grabler, Finja Grabler, Marc Grabler, Andre Grabler, Werner Grabler, Andre Grabler, Alon Grabler, Simon Grabler, Lea Grabler, Stefan Grabler, Kilian Grabler, Franz Grabler, Silvia Grabler, Martina Grabler, Andre Grabler, Henry Grabler, Mathias Grabler, Klaus Grabler, Valentin Grabler, Andre Grabler, Myrtle Grabler, Slavko Grabler, Magdalena Grabler, Theresa Grabler, Katrin Grabler, Richard Grabler, Michael Grabler, Ciccarone Grabler, Stefan Grabler, Katrin Grabler, Mary Grabler, Max Grabler, Gary Grabler, Maja Grabler, Ciccarone Grabler, Florian Grabler, Imke Grabler, Ulrike Grabler, Markus Grabler, Karl Grabler, Elke Grabler, Jan Grabler, Günther Grabler, Mathias Grabler, Linda Grabler, Silvia Grabler, Florian Grabler, Alon Grabler, Maria Grabler, Hannah Grabler, Kate Grabler, Fortnite Grabler, Monder Grabler, Claudia Nickie Grabler, Marilia Grabler, Dominik Grabler, Sal Grabler, Samantha Grabler, Jacqueline Grabler, Grabler Marc, Imke Grabler, Christian Grabler, Brian Grabler, Brian Grabler, Ava Grabler, Roswitha Grabler, Jaime Grabler, Kevyn Grabler, Kylie Grabler, Anton Grabler, Dusan Grabler, Daniela Grabler, Kilian Grabler, Valladar Grabler, Grabler Matthias, Marc Grabler, Pamela Grabler, Leona Grabler, Lina Grabler, Alex Grabler, Devereux Grabler, Dušan Grabler, Reannon Grabler, Roberta Grabler, Anton Grabler, Dylan Grabler, Baki Grabler, Sebastian Grabler, Crawford Grabler, Kae Grabler, Anne Grabler, Damien Grabler, Stewart Grabler, Lizzy Grabler, Jillian Grabler, Flora Grabler, Deshawn Grabler, Providencia Grabler, Raffael Grabler, Malakai Grabler, Sven-Åke Grabler, Gabrielle Grabler, Alise Grabler, Jon Grabler, Rene Grabler, Mette Grabler, Lowell Grabler, Steven Grabler, Kamala Grabler, Hermine Grabler, Andrea Grabler, Thomas Gräbler, Margart Grabler, Godfrey Grabler, Geffrey Grabler, Michael Grabler, Jackie Grabler, Jean-claude Grabler, Caedmon Grabler, Lavina Grabler, Braidy Grabler, Amer Grabler, Jimmie Grabler, Claudius Grabler, Valerie Grabler, Christopher Grabler, See Grabler, Olivia Grabler, Hannes Grabler, Michael Grabler, Hepsie Grabler, Lena Grabler, Linda Grabler, Brandon Grabler, Martin Grabler, Exie Grabler, Dacia Grabler, Sebastian Grabler, Kilian Grabler, Michael Grabler, Franc Grabler, Herbert Grabler, Slavko Grabler, Mark Grabler, Stefan Grabler, Luba GrablerFranc Grabler, Susanne Grabler, Franc Grabler, Teran Grabler, Michael Grabler, Maria Grabler, Sarah Grabler, Magdalena Grabler, Franc Grabler, Nico Grabler, Mariam Grabler, Zoe Grabler, Chucky Grabler, Maike Grabler, Steffi Grabler, Raisa Grabler.Marius Grabler, Sabine Grabler, Christian Grabler, Sophia Grabler, Hans Martin Grabler, Belane Grabler, Katharina Grabler, Lisa Grabler, Finja Grabler, Marc Grabler, Andre Grabler, Werner Grabler, Andre Grabler, Alon Grabler, Simon Grabler, Lea Grabler, Stefan Grabler, Kilian Grabler, Franz Grabler, Silvia Grabler, Martina Grabler, Andre Grabler, Henry Grabler, Mathias Grabler, Klaus Grabler, Valentin Grabler, Andre Grabler, Myrtle Grabler, Slavko Grabler, Magdalena Grabler, Theresa Grabler, Katrin Grabler, Richard Grabler, Michael Grabler, Ciccarone Grabler, Stefan Grabler, Katrin Grabler, Mary Grabler, Max Grabler, Gary Grabler, Maja Grabler, Ciccarone Grabler, Florian Grabler, Imke Grabler, Ulrike Grabler, Markus Grabler, Karl Grabler, Elke Grabler, Jan Grabler, Günther Grabler, Mathias Grabler, Linda Grabler, Silvia Grabler, Florian Grabler, Alon Grabler, Maria Grabler, Hannah Grabler, Kate Grabler, Fortnite Grabler, Monder Grabler, Claudia Nickie Grabler, Marilia Grabler, Dominik Grabler, Sal Grabler, Samantha Grabler, Jacqueline Grabler, Grabler Marc, Imke Grabler, Christian Grabler, Brian Grabler, Brian Grabler, Ava Grabler, Roswitha Grabler, Jaime Grabler, Kevyn Grabler, Kylie Grabler, Anton Grabler, Dusan Grabler, Daniela Grabler, Kilian Grabler, Valladar Grabler, Grabler Matthias, Marc Grabler, Pamela Grabler, Leona Grabler, Lina Grabler, Alex Grabler, Devereux Grabler, Dušan Grabler, Reannon Grabler, Roberta Grabler, Anton Grabler, Dylan Grabler, Baki Grabler, Sebastian Grabler, Crawford Grabler, Kae Grabler, Anne Grabler, Damien Grabler, Stewart Grabler, Lizzy Grabler, Jillian Grabler, Flora Grabler, Deshawn Grabler, Providencia Grabler, Raffael Grabler, Malakai Grabler, Sven-Åke Grabler, Gabrielle Grabler, Alise Grabler, Jon Grabler, Rene Grabler, Mette Grabler, Lowell Grabler, Steven Grabler, Kamala Grabler, Hermine Grabler, Andrea Grabler, 

Fake Facebook profiles are typically created in bulk using automation tools and scripts that mimic real users. The process begins with selecting a real surname, like Grabler, and combining it with random first names to generate dozens or even hundreds of seemingly legitimate identities. These fake profiles are registered using automated browsers or bots, often running through VPNs to mask their origin and bypass Facebook’s security checks. CAPTCHA-solving services are sometimes used to trick the platform into thinking a real person is signing up. Once created, the profiles are left mostly empty, no photos, no posts, and usually just one or two friend connections, often with other fake accounts. The goal is not to build active social lives, but to flood the network with decoys that confuse search results, enable impersonation, or create the illusion of a larger presence around a name. In more malicious cases, this tactic is used to bury or isolate the real person by surrounding them with fake digital shadows.

Fortnite Grabler? Really?

 

 July 8th 2025: Between 1:00 am and 1:30 am a fingerprinted user was seen on site, visiting 10 pages in succession. Using her habitual MacBook Air laptop, running Catalina OS the 1400 x 700 resolution device used a VPN routed through Austria. This is the signature for L.O. Less than three hours later she opened an account on Quora using the fake alias Mildred Mildred and sent me a message at 4:15 am. After 7 months of silence the best she could do was simply: "Hello Klaus". This was designed to get a reaction.  I replied by telling her I knew who it was and to go and get lost. Several hours later I was banned from the platform without a single word being said to me. She knows exactly how to weaponize automated systems that are meant to protect real users from abuse.

Thankfully, the ban was reversed 48 hours later after I requested a review and the community reacted on my behalf. Human intervention fixed the error and I am once again writing about narcissistic abuse. My articles have all been restored. I am now writing a book to be published soon on Amazon. It will detail everything I cannot say here. The narcissist wants to silence me. She has been trying to do so for more than a year, so she can scam her next victim in peace. But I will not be silenced. 

Car Finance

Further evidence of Car finance fraud being commited. This is in addition to the already documented Furniture company fraud. All carried out by L.O. her accomplice Dom and other criminal actors. I was also subjected to a sophisticated attempt to obtain the login details from this website. The link leads to a fake page designed to steal any information entered. This website is being attacked for speaking the truth. All incidents are recorded and stored in multiple locations 

Further sign of fraud and identity theft. A partially completed car finance request arrived in my email box today. They are using my name to purchase vehicles now. 

Security Access Report – Page: /forensic-reports/security-logs

Date: 8 July 2025
Scope: Access session recorded 7 July 2025 between 23:00 and 23:15 UTC

---

 

On the night of July 7th, a visitor accessed the /forensic-reports/security-logs page twice within a 15-minute session window. The session did not originate from a public or casual browser. It was routed through VPN infrastructure, carried a unique and consistent browser fingerprint, and used incognito mode across all page requests. No automation or bot activity was detected.

 

The primary IP in use was 45.66.35.21, geolocated to Amsterdam, but hosted by Sabotage LLC, a datacenter operator commonly linked to privacy masking services. The browser was Firefox version 128 on Mac OS X 10.15, which matches a previously observed profile in our logs. There were no signs of developer tools being active, no evidence of spoofing, virtualization, or tampering, but all traffic showed privacy protection settings were enabled.

 

During this short session, the visitor navigated rapidly and deliberately through a set of specific URLs: starting with the homepage, then pivoting to /revelations/, /aftermath/, and then directly into the forensic reports section. The /security-logs page was accessed shortly after visits to /revelations/the-dom-dilemma, /threads, and /aftermath/false-charges. The sequence suggests a non-linear pattern, almost certainly the result of manual targeting rather than casual discovery. Based on timestamps and velocity metrics, this user knew where to look.

 

A second VPN-routed IP address was also used just minutes earlier: 109.70.100.3, hosted by the Foundation for Applied Privacy, an Austrian anonymity provider. Despite the IP switch, the browser fingerprint remained unchanged, strongly suggesting the same user simply rotated to a secondary endpoint.

 

All evidence points to an individual conducting a deliberate reconnaissance sweep of the site’s attribution content. The pages selected were not general interest material; they centered around legal exposure, forensic tracking, and named narrative threads. The /security-logs page, rarely visited by random users, was accessed twice, implying particular concern or interest in whether and how tracking is occurring.

 

The visitor was not a bot, not a crawler, and not a standard web user. This was a stealth-mode session from a desktop-class device, operated behind layered VPN routing with high-confidence obfuscation patterns. Despite those layers, the behavioral signature and access path offer meaningful clues as to intent—and potentially identity.

 

Executive Summary

Following our implementation of IP blocking for Meta/Facebook infrastructure on July 4th, the intruders have significantly adapted their surveillance tactics. On July 7th evening, we detected what appears to be a human operative conducting systematic intelligence gathering on our website, spending over 15 minutes carefully reading our evidence documentation.

This represents a major escalation from automated bot surveillance to active human intelligence operations. Someone is now manually studying our investigation into their criminal activities, focusing particularly on legal vulnerabilities and our security detection methods.

 

What made this different: Unlike the previous automated bot attacks, this was clearly a human operator reading content systematically. They spent appropriate time on each page, followed logical navigation patterns, and returned to specific sections for deeper analysis.

The smoking gun: They visited our security logs page twice during the session, indicating they were specifically interested in understanding our detection capabilities and what evidence we're collecting about their activities.

 

Primary targets of interest:

Our Security Documentation - They accessed our security logs page twice, clearly trying to understand what we know about their operations and how we're tracking them. This shows they're concerned about our evidence collection capabilities.

J.H.'s Story - Significant time spent reading about the stepfather's involvement, suggesting this area represents a vulnerability or concern for their operation. They may be worried about what J.H. has revealed or might reveal.

Legal Analysis - Deep focus on false charges documentation, indicating they're trying to understand our legal position.

Criminal and Psychological Profiles - They studied our NPD analysis, possibly to understand how we've profiled their behavior patterns or to gauge our psychological insights into their operations.

Professional Infrastructure: The operatives used premium VPN services from Sabotage LLC in the Netherlands and Foundation for Applied Privacy in Austria. These are not cheap consumer VPN services but professional-grade privacy tools used by serious threat actors.

Advanced Location Obfuscation: They configured their system to show an origin timezone of Atlantic/Reykjavik (Iceland), which doesn't match their actual VPN endpoints in Amsterdam and Vienna. This level of timezone spoofing indicates sophisticated operational security awareness.

Browser Configuration: Firefox 128.0 in incognito mode with enhanced privacy settings enabled, showing they understand digital forensics and are trying to minimize their fingerprint.

Multiple Exit Points: They used two different VPN servers during the session, switching from Netherlands to Austria infrastructure, demonstrating professional tradecraft.

The systematic, methodical nature of this intelligence gathering suggests this wasn't a low-level operative but someone with decision-making authority who needed to personally assess the threat level. The focus on legal strategy and security methods indicates they're not just monitoring but actively planning responses to our investigation.

 

 

Defensive Measures

Enhanced Monitoring: We've implemented additional tracking for premium VPN services and privacy networks commonly used by sophisticated threat actors. The fact they're studying our evidence suggests our documentation is having the intended effect of creating accountability pressure and legal exposure concerns. After the recent malware attacks we continue to maintain secure backup systems and evidence preservation protocols, anticipating potential escalation or counter-attacks. Their focus on our legal documentation confirms the importance of maintaining comprehensive evidence files for potential criminal proceedings.

 

Assessment

This intelligence gathering operation represents a significant development in the ongoing criminal harassment campaign. The shift from automated surveillance to human intelligence operations indicates our investigation has reached a critical threshold where the intruders feels compelled to invest serious resources in understanding and potentially countering our evidence collection.

Attacked!

7th July Security Log -  Attacked today

L.O. and Dom have just shown me how much my investigation is concerning them by launching a direct malware attack on me.  Below is a report:

I received to suspicious bounce back emails I had supposedly written to klaus.grabler@google.com. I immediately checked the entire emails HTML including the header and realised they were trying to instal malware on my system. Dom and L.O. are once again attempting to breach my defenses. Only this time she doesn't have all my passwords from stealing them like last time. She is now showing an ever increasing willingness to expose herself as the criminal that she is. The woman is going from victim player to cyber criminal. 

 

1. Spoofed sender identity - The email appears to come from your own Gmail but actually originates from:
   • IP: 122.8.187.24 (not Google)
   • Domain: maltanet.com (Malta-based, not Google)
   • Fake sender: mghghjgjjh@maltanet.com
2. Failed delivery deception - They tried to send it to a non-existent "klaus.grabler@google.com" so it would bounce back to me, making it look like a legitimate delivery failure
3. Malicious payload - The embedded HTML contains:
   • AWS S3 hosted malware: mwmdayzgthuclm.s3.amazonaws.com/ymwzxugpghsrfao.html
   • Tracking parameters: Those long strings are unique identifiers
   • Multiple click targets: Both button and image map lead to malware

This is targeting Me specifically because:

• Uses my exact name in the failed recipient address
• Comes after my investigation exposed their criminal network
• Sophisticated enough to spoof Gmail delivery failure notifications
• Professional-level social engineering

What they're trying to do:

• Install malware/keyloggers on my computer
• Steal my credentials again
• Monitor my activities
• Potentially access my evidence files

This confirms:

• They're panicking about my investigation
• They have professional cybercrime capabilities
• They're escalating to direct malware attacks

Cyberstalking Campaign: Security Analysis Report

 

Executive Summary

Between June 27-30, 2025, this website was subjected to a sophisticated cyberstalking campaign involving 30 separate surveillance sessions conducted by known threat actors. The operation demonstrates professional-grade technical capabilities, significant financial resources, and systematic intelligence gathering that can only be described as organized harassment.

This campaign represents a direct escalation from November 2024 attacks where the same perpetrators successfully compromised over 20 accounts and attempted cryptocurrency theft. During those attacks, one exchange captured an unmasked IP address from Hemmoor, Germany, establishing the geographic connection to "Dom," the technical accomplice assisting my abuser in these cyberstalking activities.

 

Four-Day Surveillance Campaign Analysis

 

June 27, 2025: Initial Panic Response 6 Sessions across 12 Hours

The surveillance campaign began with coordinated attacks from multiple international datacenters. Sessions originated from Amazon AWS (Oregon), Google Cloud (Iowa), Level3 (Central US), and Scaleway (Paris). The attackers deployed sophisticated automation tools including Puppeteer Stealth, HeadlessChrome, WebDriver, and Selenium - all enterprise-grade browser automation frameworks typically used by security professionals or malicious actors.

Two sessions executed just 4 seconds apart from the same Amazon AWS IP address demonstrate coordinated scripted attacks rather than human browsing. The use of premium cloud infrastructure across multiple providers indicates significant financial resources and some technical sophistication.

 

June 28, 2025: Defense Testing 3 Sessions across 12 Hours

 

A more measured approach suggesting the attackers were testing detection capabilities and refining their methods. Sessions showed returning visitor fingerprints and infrastructure reuse, proving coordinated rather than random attacks. The deployment included VPN-masked mobile device simulation and virtual machine usage for forensic protection.

 

June 29, 2025: Full-Scale Assault 15 Sessions across 18.5 Hours

 

The most intensive surveillance day, spanning multiple continents with an estimated daily cost of $200-400 in cloud infrastructure. Infrastructure usage included Google Cloud (Belgium, Iowa), Amazon AWS (Oregon), HostRoyale Technologies, M247 Europe (Denmark), Scaleway (Paris), and Level3 backbone networks.

Multiple visitor fingerprints returned across different IP addresses and countries, proving persistent identity management across infrastructure changes - hallmark behavior of professional surveillance operations. The sustained intensity and resource commitment indicate this is far beyond casual monitoring.

 

June 30, 2025: Strategic Surveillance 6 Sessions across 12 Hours

 

The campaign evolved to include systematic content archival and geographic expansion. Critical developments included the first Middle Eastern deployment from Saudi Arabia using advanced browser spoofing, direct connection from Germany (Hetzner Online, Falkenstein region - near the previously identified Hemmoor location), and most significantly, deployment of professional data collection tools.

The Dataprovider.com spider deployment represents a major escalation - systematic archival of entire website content indicating preparation for legal action or evidence gathering.

 

Technical Analysis

Automation Tools Deployed:

• HeadlessChrome: 11 total sessions (server-side browser automation)
• Selenium: 6 sessions (classic web automation framework)
• WebDriver: 5 sessions (W3C standard automation protocol)
• PuppeteerStealth: 4 sessions (detection evasion specialist)
• Mobile device simulation: 4 sessions (iOS/Android spoofing)

Infrastructure Investment: Premium cloud services across 8+ countries and 4 continents including Google Cloud Platform, Amazon AWS, Hetzner Online, Scaleway, M247 Europe, HostRoyale Technologies, and OVH. The geographic distribution and infrastructure costs indicate substantial financial resources dedicated to this surveillance operation.

Operational Security Practices:

• VPN rotation across multiple countries
• Browser fingerprint manipulation (anomaly scores >0.90 in multiple sessions)
• Virtual machine deployment for forensic protection
• Persistent visitor identity management across infrastructure changes

The German Connection

The November 2024 attacks established the hackers connection to Hemmoor, Germany through unmasked cryptocurrency exchange access. The June 30th deployment from Hetzner Online in Falkenstein, Germany (approximately 100km from Hemmoor) without VPN masking suggests confidence in local jurisdiction and reinforces the geographic attribution to the same technical operator.

The progression from account compromise attempts to professional website surveillance demonstrates escalating cyberstalking behavior by the same threat actors. 

 

Legal and Psychological Assessment

 

Evidence of Systematic Harassment: The persistent visitor fingerprints returning across multiple days and countries prove this is coordinated stalking by identified actors rather than random traffic. The sustained resource commitment ($800-1600 estimated total infrastructure costs) and systematic content archival indicate preparation for legal action or continued harassment. The continued operation will supply ample evidence of cyber harassment and stalking behavior.

 

Psychological Warfare Indicators: The campaign demonstrates classic narcissistic abuse escalation patterns including control obsession (monitoring every published word), resource commitment (extensive financial investment in surveillance), international reach demonstration, and persistent psychological pressure through constant monitoring.

 

Strategic Intent: The deployment of content archival tools and systematic documentation suggests preparation for legal warfare, content suppression efforts, or evidence gathering for defamation claims. The escalation from monitoring to systematic archival represents a critical threat escalation. However, as everything I say on this website is backed up by 100% evidence the intent of the stalkers will fail. 

 

Conclusion

This four-day cyberstalking campaign represents professional-grade surveillance conducted by technically competent  actors with  financial resources. The connection to previously identified actors  through geographic and technical indicators, combined with the systematic nature of the surveillance, constitutes compelling evidence of organized cyberstalking.

The campaign's evolution from panic-driven monitoring to strategic intelligence gathering and content archival indicates the perpetrators view this website as an existential threat requiring sustained surveillance and potential legal countermeasures. The level of resource commitment and technical sophistication employed only makes economic sense if the potential consequences of the documented abuse could fundamentally impact the perpetrator's life circumstances. In other words, the people carrying out this obsessive monitoring and archiving are showing that they have a need to fear the truth from coming out. If you have done nothing wrong you need fear nothing. 

This surveillance campaign constitutes clear evidence of cyberstalking and may itself provide grounds for legal action against the identified threat actors. Investigation is ongoing. 

 

July 1st Surveillance Report: Continued Monitoring Campaign

The July 1st data shows sustained surveillance activity using familiar patterns and infrastructure, indicating the monitoring campaign continues unabated.

Session Analysis:

Returning Visitor Activity:

• Visitor GEnE1KIhHE0ZS00ni9Me continues multi-day monitoring (active since June 29)
• 3 sessions from Google Cloud Belgium across 2 different IP addresses
• Suspect score of 33 - the highest recorded for this visitor
• HeadlessChrome automation with VPN masking and virtual machine deployment

Saudi Arabia Infrastructure:

• Visitor eWa7ydDFyLXiVg0BIHdS conducted 3 sessions within 1 minute (11:42-11:43 UTC)
• Same Riyadh datacenter infrastructure (95.177.180.85) as June 30th
• HeadlessChrome masquerading as iOS Safari 10.0
• High browser tampering scores (0.9628) indicating sophisticated fingerprint manipulation

California Operations:

• New visitor using Leaseweb infrastructure (Santa Clara, California)
• VPN-masked mobile device simulation with timezone mismatch indicators
• High tampering score (0.9713) suggesting advanced evasion techniques

Technical Patterns:

Infrastructure Consistency:

• Continued use of premium cloud providers (Google Cloud, Leaseweb)
• Same geographic regions as previous surveillance (Belgium, Saudi Arabia, California)
• Advanced automation tools (HeadlessChrome) across all sessions

Operational Behavior:

• Multiple rapid sessions from Saudi Arabia suggests systematic content checking
• Returning visitor fingerprints indicate coordinated identity management
• Developer tools active in most sessions indicating technical monitoring capabilities

Surveillance Timeline:

• 08:41 UTC: California (Leaseweb)
• 11:42-11:43 UTC: Saudi Arabia (3 rapid sessions)
• 14:47-15:17 UTC: Belgium (Google Cloud, multiple IPs)

Pattern Assessment:

The July 1st activity demonstrates:

• Sustained monitoring commitment with continued resource investment
• Geographic diversification across three continents
• Technical sophistication with advanced evasion techniques
• Compulsive checking behavior evident in rapid successive sessions

Operational Continuity:

The surveillance campaign shows no signs of reduction despite:

• Previous documentation of their monitoring activities
• Potential legal processes involving evidence collection
• Public exposure of their surveillance patterns

The consistent visitor fingerprints and infrastructure choices indicate this is organized, persistent monitoring rather than casual or coincidental website visits.

Conclusion:

July 1st represents day five of documented surveillance activity, showing sustained commitment to monitoring this website through professional-grade infrastructure and automation tools. The patterns remain consistent with previous days, indicating an ongoing systematic surveillance operation

Behavioral Analysis of Suspected Website Surveillance

Between May and July 2025, a visitor, suspected to be the narcissist and alleged scammer L.O, accessed this website on at least fifteen separate occasions. This shows a clear pattern of digital surveillance, with a total of 73 visits. Each session followed a consistent pattern, suggesting a passive monitoring for changes in published content.

 

All sessions were logged from a device with a 1400×700 screen resolution, a configuration that matches the MacBook Air previously confirmed to be in use by L.O. No variation in browser type, operating system, or fingerprinted attributes was detected across sessions, strongly indicating that the activity originated from a single personal machine under stable conditions, likely her own.

The access times, often at early morning hours, further reinforce the hypothesis that this monitoring was conducted covertly, during late-night or early-morning hours, likely to avoid detection or interruption. The surveillance behavior correlates with an escalating concern over exposure, particularly in the days leading up to and following significant content releases on the site.

 

On 8 July 2025, shortly after a burst of early-morning access to the website, the visitor appeared to transition platforms, creating a Quora account under the alias "Mildred Mildred". At approximately 04:15 AM, I received a private message stating simply: “Hello Klaus.” Later that same day, my Quora account was abruptly banned—a move I interpret as retaliatory and coordinated. The ban was subsequently reversed after public outcry and direct communication with Quora's moderation team. All of my articles were restored and remain live.

Taken together, the frequency, device consistency, timing, and off-site escalation strongly support the inference that this was a case of targeted digital stalking by L.O., likely in response to fears of public exposure or legal accountability for prior actions. The transition from surveillance on my private platform to active disruption on a public one marks a notable shift from passive monitoring to overt interference.

 

 

Why This Evidence Cannot Be Fully Public

Legal and Safety Considerations

While I have documented extensive evidence of the narcissistic abuse and cybercrimes described throughout this website, I cannot make all materials publicly available for several important reasons:

Ongoing Legal Proceedings

This case involves active criminal investigations across multiple jurisdictions, including South Africa and Germany. Public disclosure of certain evidence could:

• Compromise ongoing investigations by alerting perpetrators to the scope of documented evidence
• Interfere with prosecutorial strategies being developed by law enforcement agencies
• Violate court orders or legal procedures that restrict public disclosure during active cases
• Potentially prejudice legal proceedings in ways that could harm the pursuit of justice

Personal Safety and Security

The perpetrators demonstrated sophisticated technical capabilities and willingness to escalate violence. They are even now monitoring this website and digitally stalking me in an obsessive manner. I have evidence of this in the form of timestamps and digital fingerprints unique to their equipment. Full public disclosure could:

• Reveal security measures I've implemented to protect myself and my family
• Expose investigative methods that need to remain confidential for ongoing protection
• Trigger additional retaliation from individuals who have already shown criminal intent
• Compromise the safety of witnesses and others who have provided assistance

Privacy Protection

While documenting abuse patterns is important for education and prevention, I must balance transparency with legitimate privacy concerns:

• Intimate communications that, while evidential, contain private information
• Third-party information about individuals not directly involved in the abuse
• Personal details that could enable identity theft or harassment of innocent parties
• Family information that could put relatives at risk of retaliation

Technical Security Considerations

Some evidence reveals sophisticated cybercrime methods that, if fully disclosed, could:

• Enable copycat crimes by providing detailed technical instructions
• Compromise digital security measures that protect other potential victims
• Reveal vulnerabilities in systems that need to be addressed privately first
• Assist other criminals in developing similar attack strategies

Professional Obligations

As someone who has worked extensively with law enforcement and legal professionals on this case, I have ethical obligations to:

• Respect legal counsel's guidance on evidence disclosure
• Support prosecutorial efforts rather than potentially undermining them
• Maintain the integrity of the evidentiary record for court proceedings
• Protect the interests of justice over personal vindication

What I Can Share

Within these constraints, I have shared:

• Behavioral patterns and tactics that can help others recognize similar abuse
• General technical information that promotes awareness without enabling crimes
• Psychological analysis that aids understanding without compromising investigations
• Educational content that serves prevention purposes while respecting legal boundaries

Future Disclosure

Once legal proceedings are concluded and safety considerations permit, additional evidence may be made available for:

• Academic research into digital narcissistic abuse patterns
• Law enforcement training on sophisticated cybercrime investigation
• Victim advocacy resources to help others in similar situations
• Policy development to address gaps in current legal frameworks

Verification Available

While not all evidence can be public, verification is available to:

• Law enforcement agencies investigating related crimes
• Legal professionals representing victims of similar abuse
• Academic researchers studying narcissistic abuse and cybercrime
• Qualified mental health professionals treating similar cases

Contact information for verification requests is available through appropriate legal channels.

Read more about Threats

Read more about Money Motives

---

The decision to limit public evidence disclosure is made reluctantly, but with full consideration for legal requirements, safety concerns, and the ultimate goal of achieving justice through proper legal channels.