The Banning: How False Allegations Led to My Expulsion – and Hers

Summary

This report documents the events surrounding my expulsion from the PIKA platform in June 2024, following a series of false and escalating accusations made by L.O. What began with claims about a Discord status quickly evolved into a full-scale character assassination, resulting in my unjustified permanent ban. However, once evidence was presented, the platform moderators revised their decision and banned L.O. This incident serves as a critical case study in reputational sabotage, procedural failure, and calculated manipulation.

The Setup

On June 12, 2024, I received an unexpected message from L.O. informing me that the PIKA moderator team would be deciding whether to ban me from the platform that very day. When I questioned this sudden development, she claimed her complaint was based solely on two minor allegations: that I had displayed her image in my Discord status and mentioned her username.

What seemed like a straightforward misunderstanding quickly revealed itself to be something far more sinister. Later that morning, I was permanently banned from PIKA without any prior communication from moderators, without being given an opportunity to present my side, and without any specific evidence being disclosed. Notice below she says:" I have decided to show you something else" This is obviously a sign that she has shown additional "evidence" to the moderators and as 'The Flynn' says later on in his message: " People have researched him and are not happy". There is nothing negative about me on the internet so I suspect she planted something about me on Google and later removed it again. She certainly sent them 'screenshots' as she says so, something she would forever cry foul about in the future when I did record screenshots of our conversation.

This message reveals a critical example of L.O.’s duplicity. While privately accusing me of breaching her trust by sharing so-called “private” files with moderators, she had in fact done the very same thing long before, without informing me. This contradiction exposes the performative victimhood she later weaponized. Behind my back, she prepared a narrated video containing her version of events and presented it to the moderators as part of a coordinated attempt to influence their judgment. At the time, she denied having done this, maintaining the illusion that everything between us was transparent. Only after I obtained this message, where she explicitly states she will send them the video link, did the truth become undeniable.

The Real Accusations

I later discovered that L.O. had submitted far more than the casual complaint she had described to me. In reality, she had created a comprehensive attack package that included a narrated video presentation against me, accompanied by severe allegations that I had been "stalking her for months." Her accusations escalated to claims of sexual harassment, death threats, and additional accusations she described as "too terrible to mention."

The disparity between what she told me privately and what she presented to the moderators reveals the calculated nature of her approach. She maintained a facade of reasonableness in our direct communication while simultaneously conducting a character assassination campaign behind the scenes.

The Contradictory Behavior

The day after my ban, L.O. initiated an 11-hour Discord exchange that exposed the true nature of her motivations. During this conversation, she stated that I "deserved to be banned" and should learn a "valuable lesson," while expressing primary concern for her own reputation in the AI community. She showed no regard for the professional harm her false allegations had caused me.

Most tellingly, she asked me to like her YouTube videos but specifically requested that I use an alternate identity to avoid moderator scrutiny. This request perfectly encapsulates the contradiction at the heart of narcissistic manipulation: publicly portraying someone as dangerous while privately seeking their support and validation.

Procedural Failures

The PIKA moderation process revealed several concerning irregularities. I was denied basic due process, receiving no information about specific allegations and no opportunity to respond. The moderators acted solely on one-sided testimony, apparently without questioning the severity of the accusations or seeking corroborating evidence.

Additionally, L.O. had a prior collaborative relationship with a moderator known as "The Flynn," which may have compromised the neutrality of the original decision. There are also indications that she may have briefly planted and later removed incriminating material from Google searches, as one moderator claimed to have "researched" me and found concerning content that could not be substantiated afterward.

The arrogance is on display here. She thinks she can dictate to the mods what punishment to give me. The Flynn, a one time collaborator with her should never have been allowed near this decision, due to his conflict of interest, clearly seen here ihis closing words :"You are very welcome. I wish nothing but the best for you". and  "It isn't because of you, it's because of HIM." Whatever "it" is , it's obvious there was more going on here than meets the eye. 

Justice Delayed but Not Denied

In mid-June 2024, I presented the complete transcript of our communications to a PIKA moderator who agreed to review the material. Upon examining the evidence, including the contradictory post-ban conversation, the moderators reversed their decision and permanently banned L.O. instead.

This reversal validates that her original allegations were baseless and contradicted by her own communications. The platform's willingness to ban her after initially banning me based solely on her word strongly supports the conclusion that her claims were deliberately manipulative rather than genuine concerns.

The Broader Pattern

The PIKA incident is not an isolated event but part of a documented pattern of behavior. L.O. routinely makes severe allegations without verifiable evidence, manipulates third parties into acting on her behalf while maintaining personal cordiality with her targets, and exhibits no remorse even when confronted with the harm her false accusations have caused.

This episode demonstrates how narcissistic manipulators weaponize institutional processes, exploiting the natural tendency of moderators and authorities to err on the side of caution when serious allegations are made. They count on the fact that most people won't investigate thoroughly or question the motivations behind accusations, especially when those accusations come from someone presenting themselves as a vulnerable victim.

Conclusion

The June 2024 PIKA banning incident reveals the sophisticated nature of L.O.'s manipulation tactics. Her ability to maintain different narratives for different audiences, her strategic use of false allegations to damage reputations, and her complete lack of remorse when exposed all point to calculated predatory behavior rather than emotional volatility or misunderstanding.

The platform's ultimate decision to ban her instead of me serves as vindication, but more importantly, it demonstrates how thorough investigation and evidence-based decision-making can expose false allegations for what they are. This case study serves as a warning about the ease with which reputations can be damaged by determined manipulators and the importance of due process in protecting innocent parties from coordinated character assassination campaigns.

The Banning on Quora

Something odd happened on July 8th, 2025 that I think is worth sharing.

Early that morning, someone accessed this website from Austria, between 1:00 a.m.  and 1:30 a.m.  The browsing pattern was methodical, focusing on the security logs and the false charges page, where I detail the fake criminal charges the narcissist has laid against me.... Then, at 4:15 a.m. I got a message on Quora from a brand new account called "Mildred Mildred."

Just two words: "Hello Klaus."

No questions, no explanation. No apology. Seven months of silence and then this? It was the first message I had received from her since November 2024 and it was even shorter than her last one, that had said: "I hope u r fine. for now...have a nice time! Immediately after that message I had been subjected to a 10 day long cyber attack where she had tried to steal my funds and damage me digitally. 

Again, the timing felt deliberate, right after she'd clearly been reading what I'd posted here about her false charges. In all she visited 10 pages on this site before opening the account on Quora. I'll be the first to admit, I responded with anger. I told her I knew it was her and then I went into some detail as to how I felt about her and what she had done to me. . 

A few hours later, my Quora account was suspended. No questions asked, no chance to explain. My account of 10 years was gone in an instant.  Now, I can't prove exactly what happened, but the sequence seems pretty clear.

Send a brief, seemingly innocent message, then report the response you knew it would provoke. It's a way to make someone else look like the aggressor while keeping your own hands clean. Remove the context, and suddenly the person reacting looks unreasonable. 

It's actually a clever tactic, if you think about it. In our digital world, platforms often act on reports quickly and often using bots, and the person who files first controls the narrative. The narcissist L.O. is an expert at making the social platforms do the dirty work for her. She had me banned from PIKA where she first pursued me, then later she had me banned from WhatsApp, Telegram and now Quora. Always the same method. Act innocent and reasonable after first abusing the victim, then when you finally contact the victim and they react with anger, take that angry reaction and use it as a means of proving that the user is unstable and claim your victimhood. 

The good news? One of the moderators is himself a victim of narcissistic abuse, and after hearing my story, checking that the account of the complainant was only just created, and knowing what these predators are  capable of, my Quora account was reinstated.

But it got me thinking about how easy it is to manipulate these systems when you understand how they work. I'm sharing this not for drama, but because I think it's a pattern worth recognizing. Sometimes the person claiming to be harassed is actually the one doing the harassing, they're just better at working the system. She has clearly done this before, as I have an email of hers where she approached the Discord support group, communicating on a first name basis with the personel, asking about deleting her entire chat history with multiple users. She did the same in PIKA, where I have an email in which she confesses to having in person meetings with a German moderator named Rhapsody and where she brags about how she has the whole mod team "behind her" (see below)

Anyway, that's what happened. The timestamps and logs tell the story pretty clearly, and now you know why I prefer having my own space to share what's actually going on.